Gael Baldock: 12 Councillors’ Myopic View damages the environment

Claiming that removing 1944 carparks is beneficial for the environment when in fact demolishing the Downtown Carpark [DTCP] for $15 million is far more detrimental.

With 99,000 tons of concrete, requiring 5500 18-ton double truckloads belching diesel fumes through the city to a landfill site (with about 500 year decomposition time) or to the Onehunga concrete crushing machinery for recycling.

The Goff-led Auckland Council received an 'unsolicited approach' to purchase the Downtown Carpark according to Councillor Coom’s Motion FIN/2020/104 15.12.2020. Councillor Darby’s Motion at the Planning Committee PLA/2021/52 3.6.2021 approved a 'competitive process', but that is not what happened. (Full details available www.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz)

Precinct Properties, owner of Commercial Bay and properties had all but one leasing agreement with the DTCP, which is held by the hotel on the seaward side of DTCP, who have agreed to waive these rights during construction for $13 million. So, Precinct had a competitive edge, no other developer could demolish it. Precinct therefore held Eke Panuku, council’s property division, ‘over a barrel’ during deal negotiations in a non-competitive market process.

They also knew the value of carparks (public $90K/private $200K) and have recently purchased the Viaduct carpark behind the Tepid Baths for their customers. Their two tower proposal, which would take five years for demolition and to build, includes 740 underground private carparks dug into this possibly toxic reclaimed land, requires an additional 10,021 truckloads carted through the city.

Everything changed when new information was presented by Save Queen Street Society Inc. [SQS] 23.11.23 showed that the sale price could have increased by at least $200 million. By building a podium on top of the existing building, as is best practice worldwide, instead of demolishing thus having less impact on the environment, saving most of the carparks, whilst opening up a competitive market process and only take two years to build. youtu.be/C9BkXum8iu4?si=LidhNg52WfLWfm-s

This alternative strategy should have started a competitive ‘bidding war’ by opening the sale process to other developers.

Precinct’s $122 million offer doesn’t provide any public parking and is conditional on council demolishing the Hobson Street flyover. First conceived in the Centre City Master Plan, it includes providing a public park and reconfiguring the surrounding roads. This has been moved sideways to the Long Term Plan and therefore the $75 million cost onto the ratepayers. Therefore the real net sale of the Downtown Carpark to council is $47 million. Certainly not worth the loss of this strategic regional asset.

Prior to the meeting, another developer had offered $180 million to build a podium on top of the existing structure, whilst retaining ownership of 1200 carparks for public use and without the cost of $75 million to ratepayers of demolishing the flyover. Therefore, $133 million more than the Precinct offer.
Council’s legal team stopped two presentations at the Governing Body meeting – Heart of the City with a petition from retailers wishing to save public parking and Gael Baldock on Downtown Carpark’s strategic location as a ‘Transport Mode Change Hub’. Waiheke Local Board, to whom these carparks are vital and had not been consulted, were moved to the ‘closed door’, confidential section, along with most of the debate.

Council voted to accept Precinct’s offer in their confidential meeting, Ignoring Councillor Lee’s motion to delay the decision until the new information was researched, therefore going against sections 77 and 79 of the Local Government Act 2002 that demands, “It is the responsibility of a local authority [in] making judgments, must have regard to the significance of all relevant matters, identify all reasonably practicable options, assess the options in terms of their advantages and disadvantages.” Council failed to comply, hence Save Queen Street Society Inc. applied for a Judicial Review, the court set a hearing for August.

The carbon footprint and the congestion to the city centre of the proposed demolition would be highly impactful. It could be avoided, along with expensive litigation by a design shift to a podium on top of the existing structure, by Precinct or another developer, then maybe those councillors wouldn’t be remembered in a bad light. 1200 public carparks could be retained, the Downtown Carpark could be sold for a fair price with its amenity value to the city, so avoiding possible rate increases in the Long Term Budget. (GAEL BALDOCK)

GaelB@xtra.co.nz

#ponsonbynews #iloveponsonby #ponsonby #auckland #aucklandshippestrip #onlyponsonby #ponsonbyroad #Greylynn #freemansbay #westmere #ponsonby #hernebay #stmarysbay #archhill #coxsbay #westernsprings #downtowncarparkauckland #carbonfootprint #recycling

February 2024